The Liberals used to be the center left party, but they're insane left now, and the NDP has always been the insane left party, and they're also insane left. Both parties have been walking around sniffing their own farts like they represent every Canadian and speak with the authority of all Canadians.
The official opposition is the party with the second largest number of seats. They sort of push back against the party in power to keep them honest.
The BQ are the Bloc Quebecois. They're literally separatists, they want Quebec to be its own country. I really want the liberals and NDP to get pantsed so badly that the separatists end up doing better than both parties, a party that got no votes at all outside of quebec, but still earns more seats than either the liberals or the NDP.
It would just be a crowning moment of funny for all these idiots talk of "Canadians want this" "Canadians want that" apparently Canadians want to either be conservative or separate tabarnac!
The official opposition is the party with the second largest number of seats. They sort of push back against the party in power to keep them honest.
The BQ are the Bloc Quebecois. They're literally separatists, they want Quebec to be its own country. I really want the liberals and NDP to get pantsed so badly that the separatists end up doing better than both parties, a party that got no votes at all outside of quebec, but still earns more seats than either the liberals or the NDP.
It would just be a crowning moment of funny for all these idiots talk of "Canadians want this" "Canadians want that" apparently Canadians want to either be conservative or separate tabarnac!
When I see someone claiming they'll save the world through social media posts, I always think of a paraphrase from my first book: "They want to save the world, they can't even save themselves"
I put way more effort into my posts than any of these idiots, and I actually make intellectual progress through my work, unlike any of these idiots. You'll routinely see me building on previous ideas I came up with or I investigated from others, and so as time goes on I'm different and my posts are different than they were before.
But am I saving the world? No. Not in the least. My hope isn't to change the world, it's to try to better myself and hopefully contribute to those who are around me in the process. If I can do that, that's enough because it's all I can actually ask for.
I put way more effort into my posts than any of these idiots, and I actually make intellectual progress through my work, unlike any of these idiots. You'll routinely see me building on previous ideas I came up with or I investigated from others, and so as time goes on I'm different and my posts are different than they were before.
But am I saving the world? No. Not in the least. My hope isn't to change the world, it's to try to better myself and hopefully contribute to those who are around me in the process. If I can do that, that's enough because it's all I can actually ask for.
I don't know man.
Hard to tell who's who over there.
Are they not supporting these same people to destabilize Syria?
Hard to tell who's who over there.
Are they not supporting these same people to destabilize Syria?
> if not authorized, HS would be all over it
Hmm.. are you suggesting the gov would never do something nefarious and authorized?
Hmm.. are you suggesting the gov would never do something nefarious and authorized?
> I'm leaning more to them being authorized objects, than anything nefarious.
Why not both? ๐คทโโ๏ธ
Why not both? ๐คทโโ๏ธ
Sane people understand how bad social media and screen time is for children, but even many of those same people haven't come to terms with how adults are affected by social media, screens, apps, etc.
> Those who design sports betting apps have created algorithms of addiction
> Those who design sports betting apps have created algorithms of addiction
https://auronmacintyre.substack.com/p/faith-and-family-are-keys-to-resisting
> individualism often led people to focus solely on their own lives and interests, leaving them indifferent to the well-being of their neighbors and their communities. This lack of civic engagement, he argued, made it easier for despots to establish tyrannical rule. A despot thrives on individual apathy and the absence of civic virtue.
> individualism often led people to focus solely on their own lives and interests, leaving them indifferent to the well-being of their neighbors and their communities. This lack of civic engagement, he argued, made it easier for despots to establish tyrannical rule. A despot thrives on individual apathy and the absence of civic virtue.