I would have thought the crypto-token experiment would be enough to demonstrate the flaws in that line of thinking.
How has it done that?
- replies
- 2
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0
It hasn’t proved useful for everyday transactions, or much else really, besides being the subject of a new tulip mania.
I find it annoying when people say things like that. It still has censorship-resistance properties which is very useful for, for example, donating to WikiLeaks or Canadian truck men.
Canada is a Western country and WikiLeaks targets Western governments so it's of interest to people in the West.
You could have done a P2P trade, maybe.
Some might say that states lack the enforcement power to prevent anything if enough people want to do it. See chapter 1 of Anti-tech Revolution: Why and How (attached).
