I would have thought the crypto-token experiment would be enough to demonstrate the flaws in that line of thinking.
How has it done that?
It hasn’t proved useful for everyday transactions, or much else really, besides being the subject of a new tulip mania.
I find it annoying when people say things like that. It still has censorship-resistance properties which is very useful for, for example, donating to WikiLeaks or Canadian truck men.
Canada is a Western country and WikiLeaks targets Western governments so it's of interest to people in the West.
- replies
- 0
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0
You could have done a P2P trade, maybe.
Some might say that states lack the enforcement power to prevent anything if enough people want to do it. See chapter 1 of Anti-tech Revolution: Why and How (attached).
