>the right’s ideology holds that if you’re starving and I’m incinerating a bunch of bread that would save your life, my property right to my bread trumps your right to not starve to death
How is that implied by "property rights are human rights"?
How is that implied by "property rights are human rights"?
Right, but it doesn't imply that your right to abuse your property is more important than someone's right to food and life. Just that they are both human rights.
So, if they have equal status then property rights trump human rights?
>For the left, human rights trump property rights wherever they come into conflict. So by definition they can't be equal, let alone part of the same thing.
Property rights could be a less important form of human right, lesser than the other human rights.
>For the left, human rights trump property rights wherever they come into conflict. So by definition they can't be equal, let alone part of the same thing.
Property rights could be a less important form of human right, lesser than the other human rights.
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 0