FBXL Social

@condret @BadFediPosts
>cracked software
Nothing wrong with that so long as it's clean of malware. I don't agree with intellectual property.
>porn
I don't mind if people look at much of that. So long as they do it privately.
Some relatively wholesome erotic anime is OK.
>conspiracy theories
It's perfectly possible for a conspiracy to actually exist. I don't know why people have such strong condemnation for that word. So long as you actually argue your case properly and not just connect random dots thoughtlessly and then be rude to people who ask questions about it.
>shitposting
I like to crack jokes too.
I don't know why you thought I would condemn all that. I just don't like looking at, as OP said, "fucked up porn" against my will.

The internet is for wholesome cat pictures

@thatbrickster I mean, how can we tell that, say, pernia is just joking but others are not?
I only tagged BadFediPosts to refer to that type of posts.

@Rasp cc: @dushman is this true?

@BadFediPosts thank you very much for warning us.
@condret the internet exists to connect people and share things that can be encoded as 0s and 1s. that is all

@lunarised @iwillbite Right, well I have a JID if you actually want help instead of just making stupid and ugly jokes online.

How do people tell when a @BadFediPosts about paedophilia is a joke versus actual paedophilia?

Is it just an us vs them thing or what?

@BadFediPosts Fucked up tier

@BadFediPosts How do we convince them that sex harms children? It seemed to work for Stallman.

@lunarised
@BadFediPosts

@AnungIkwe Particularly the "sovereign dominion" one. That was new to me.

@AnungIkwe Does anyone have sources for those claims?

@lunarised @iwillbite Do you ask for help when you need it in real life?

@cajax @caekislove @gentoobro @condret who tf calls that art?

@cajax train a local model on your sense of humour then

@cajax @Forestofenchantment Oh cool, hachi is still around. Based.

@cajax buddy just means friend. It's gender neutral. Lol @ being butthurt people might compare you to a minority

@cajax "imply" in this context means logical implication, I.e. proof, not the everyday meaning of indirectly implying something

@cajax Does anyone say they aren't? In my experience "correlation ≠> causation" is used to imply that you shouldn't just assume causation from correlation. I.e. exactly what it appears to say.

@cajax source?