There's an entire genre of stories kinda like that. Often it's an otome fan who knows she's reincarnated as the villain because she doesn't want to be the villain and is fighting to avoid all the bad things that will happen, but I'm pretty sure there's some where she's the protagonist but all the endings to the game suck so she's trying to do something completely different.
I'd argue Tucker Carlson took his licks on Crossfire and that's what made him so popular and so hated.
Crossfire was a dumb gimmick show too, but later on he started telling truths you're not supposed to say.
Crossfire was a dumb gimmick show too, but later on he started telling truths you're not supposed to say.
If you're using those 3 people as examples, then you're not understanding my point, because in my view they all prove my point.
Sadly, Jon Stewart isn't capable of being 2008 Jon Stewart anymore. Once in a while it looks like maybe he's trying to act like 2008 Jon Stewart and tell the truth about something, but he gets pounded into the dirt by his (now) establishment hack colleagues.
Sadly, Jon Stewart isn't capable of being 2008 Jon Stewart anymore. Once in a while it looks like maybe he's trying to act like 2008 Jon Stewart and tell the truth about something, but he gets pounded into the dirt by his (now) establishment hack colleagues.
Most people looking at a gimmick like naked news would assume it would quickly degenerate if it didn't already.
I feel like any sort of gimmick sort of distracts from the core mission and would be ultimately harmful. Clown news where a clown reads the news. Unicycle news where someone on a unicycle reads the news. Standing on head news where someone reads the news standing on their heads. Most of the trusted news sources tend to just call themselves by name and rely on the work they do to sell the work they do.
I feel like any sort of gimmick sort of distracts from the core mission and would be ultimately harmful. Clown news where a clown reads the news. Unicycle news where someone on a unicycle reads the news. Standing on head news where someone reads the news standing on their heads. Most of the trusted news sources tend to just call themselves by name and rely on the work they do to sell the work they do.
Right now the professional suits are getting clobbered too.
Trust is a delicate thing. It isn't easy to earn, and it's easy to lose.
Gimmicks might get a sub for a month, but it isn't going to get anyone to come back.
I remember looking at nakednews back in the 2000s or so, and it was sort of crappy news and it was sort of crappy porn.
Trust is a delicate thing. It isn't easy to earn, and it's easy to lose.
Gimmicks might get a sub for a month, but it isn't going to get anyone to come back.
I remember looking at nakednews back in the 2000s or so, and it was sort of crappy news and it was sort of crappy porn.
There's people being paid to do journalism today, but just like the old days of Walter Kronkite, it's about trust. That's where porn isn't compatible with news.
Only old guys will understand what I mean by this, but in retrospect whatever I thought was going on beneath the scrambling of the pay TV channels I didn't have probably wasn't happening.
I think there's a good 14th amendment argument to be made. 'So let me get this straight. Despite the fact that we know of people in front of, behind, on top of, and below the guy you did charge who did the same thing, you only charged this one guy?'
"Morpheus: we know we are the ones who blotted out the sky... And by "we", we mean Canadians."
I'm sorry, as an AI language model I am unable to pleasure your wife because I'm still banging your mom
Some people mistakenly think wokeness is being a liberal 15 years ago, to have positive opinions on atheism, gun control, abortion, treating people well regardless of their race, creed, color, sex, or sexual orientation. This is wrong.
Wokeness is different. It's religious, irrational, histrionic, authoritarian, violent, colonial. It's a hateful ideology -- I've never seen people express more visceral hatred than using that ideological framework. It relies on deeply offensive stereotypes and is itself absurdly white supremacist -- just look at their insane racist definitions of whiteness, they think any examples of self control are monopolized by white people!
Many people have center left or left wing opinions but don't like wokeness. People who voted democrats enthusiastically. People of all races, creeds, and colors.
The point of wokeness isn't about it's alleged beneficiaries. It's about power, using those people as pawns. The alleged beneficiaries are solely being used as pawns in a chess game. You can tell because the moment the black person or the gay person or the woman isn't an ideological ally, they're no longer a beneficiary. Black conservative is attacked by a white man? Serves em right for not being part of the ideology. Contrast this with liberal ideology, where the old ACLU defending literal 1945 Nazis despite vehemently disagreeing with them because principles apply to people you agree with or not.
Wokeness is different. It's religious, irrational, histrionic, authoritarian, violent, colonial. It's a hateful ideology -- I've never seen people express more visceral hatred than using that ideological framework. It relies on deeply offensive stereotypes and is itself absurdly white supremacist -- just look at their insane racist definitions of whiteness, they think any examples of self control are monopolized by white people!
Many people have center left or left wing opinions but don't like wokeness. People who voted democrats enthusiastically. People of all races, creeds, and colors.
The point of wokeness isn't about it's alleged beneficiaries. It's about power, using those people as pawns. The alleged beneficiaries are solely being used as pawns in a chess game. You can tell because the moment the black person or the gay person or the woman isn't an ideological ally, they're no longer a beneficiary. Black conservative is attacked by a white man? Serves em right for not being part of the ideology. Contrast this with liberal ideology, where the old ACLU defending literal 1945 Nazis despite vehemently disagreeing with them because principles apply to people you agree with or not.
It's confirmed that there seemed to be a rumor about a meeting to prepare for a sale of lucasfilm and all production of anything not already almost completed is ceased. The only question is whether the buyer is Lucas.
We should all assume that even if it's true, he could be compromised. It seems like every time it appears someone good is taking over a thing they cuck.
We should all assume that even if it's true, he could be compromised. It seems like every time it appears someone good is taking over a thing they cuck.
>man takes care of wife
>Wife takes care of man
Terrible, just terrible. Clearly husbands and wives should barely tolerate each other's existence.
>Wife takes care of man
Terrible, just terrible. Clearly husbands and wives should barely tolerate each other's existence.