Not to mention our establishment is like evil clippy.
"I see you wearing boys pants. Would you like life altering drugs or surgery?" Um no evil clippy I just want pockets. "You have chosen life altering surgery. Congratulations on your bravery!"
"I see you wearing boys pants. Would you like life altering drugs or surgery?" Um no evil clippy I just want pockets. "You have chosen life altering surgery. Congratulations on your bravery!"
Took me a bit to unspool your sentence, but in context I completely agree.
The establishment told the Republicans to vote for anyone but Trump, and the Democrats to vote for Biden, and the Republicans didn't do as they were told, and the Democrats did. Ironic given their respective narratives.
The establishment told the Republicans to vote for anyone but Trump, and the Democrats to vote for Biden, and the Republicans didn't do as they were told, and the Democrats did. Ironic given their respective narratives.
https://www.youtube.com/shorts/dW0f0EmQpaQ
He's totally serious (and generally does good work), but the beginning of this video was the funniest thing I ever heard all day.
"They thought women barely had agency so they would just do funny things when they were bored and lesbianism was just one of those things"
He's totally serious (and generally does good work), but the beginning of this video was the funniest thing I ever heard all day.
"They thought women barely had agency so they would just do funny things when they were bored and lesbianism was just one of those things"
That was a really nice article. Easy to want to block Users and servers, but you need true diversity in part because what if you're wrong and you're blocking something real and true?
You're clearly not that familiar with proper English accents.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpX8NZMxp9Q
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UpX8NZMxp9Q
Kier Starmer sounds like a troll name. "Ok wanker, which of the Rs you're saying are real and which are you injecting into the name because you're English? And which are supposed to be there but you took them out because you're English?"
Bad idea trying to rely on advanced technology of any kind if society is over... That's half the joke of the meme.
Hasn't been so embarrassing to be a German since that Austrian vegan artist took over spouting Karl Marx.
The same things that indicate a lady is really into you can also indicate that she's completely crazygonuts.
For example, a major symptom of borderline personality disorder is cycles of ideation and demonization, so early on it can look like a hot girl is really into you but it turns out she flips between loving you and hating you. I recall there was a similar disorder mentioned in the johnny depp trial where she ended up all over everyone because of that disorder.
I dated one girl who was hot enough to be a model and a blast to be around, but it ended up being what I call today "vacation in Cancun" -- a vacation in Cancun is super fun for a week or two, but if you stayed a year you'd be bored or half dead. I don't know enough psychology to guess what it was, but that pathological need to constantly find more stimulation isn't healthy.
For example, a major symptom of borderline personality disorder is cycles of ideation and demonization, so early on it can look like a hot girl is really into you but it turns out she flips between loving you and hating you. I recall there was a similar disorder mentioned in the johnny depp trial where she ended up all over everyone because of that disorder.
I dated one girl who was hot enough to be a model and a blast to be around, but it ended up being what I call today "vacation in Cancun" -- a vacation in Cancun is super fun for a week or two, but if you stayed a year you'd be bored or half dead. I don't know enough psychology to guess what it was, but that pathological need to constantly find more stimulation isn't healthy.
I pledged never to sell my users personal data because I'm too lazy and I don't think they'd give me enough money for it.
This whole scenario is one of the things that scares me. What if it was the middle of winter and a particularly cold winter at that? If it's 40 below, and your furnace isn't running, it doesn't take that long for your house to be destroyed and that's assuming that your family finds some other place to stay warm.
For that reason, I acquired a generator, and several large gas cans full of gas, with stabilizer so I can sit on it for a few years and it'll still turn a motor over. Because I don't want to completely waste it if there's no emergency, I use it to mow the lawn and snow blow as well.
I was living in Ottawa in the summer of 2003 when the whole Pacific Northwest power grid went down. The whole climate was new to me, very very warm compared to what I'm used to, and the grid was down for quite some time. It was pretty bad in the summer, but incomparable to the winter.
For that reason, I acquired a generator, and several large gas cans full of gas, with stabilizer so I can sit on it for a few years and it'll still turn a motor over. Because I don't want to completely waste it if there's no emergency, I use it to mow the lawn and snow blow as well.
I was living in Ottawa in the summer of 2003 when the whole Pacific Northwest power grid went down. The whole climate was new to me, very very warm compared to what I'm used to, and the grid was down for quite some time. It was pretty bad in the summer, but incomparable to the winter.
One of the most difficult things for human beings to do is to eventually try to figure out how to embrace paradox.
It's like... Do we need plastics? Yes. Undoubtedly. Are plastics bad for the environment? Yes. Undoubtedly. You can't rationalize the two because they're both true.
While you can't rationalize the two, you do need to deal with the consequences of the two in a complex world, and moreover the complexity of both sets of people advocating for their viewpoint not being entirely honest.
It's like... Do we need plastics? Yes. Undoubtedly. Are plastics bad for the environment? Yes. Undoubtedly. You can't rationalize the two because they're both true.
While you can't rationalize the two, you do need to deal with the consequences of the two in a complex world, and moreover the complexity of both sets of people advocating for their viewpoint not being entirely honest.
The world you grew up in no longer exists, that's true.
It could never exist any longer because your grandparents are dead of old age, you parents are old, you are an adult, and your kids are now the ones growing up in the world. Like a flowing stream, the water itself has moved on. Someday your parents will be dead, you will be old, your kids will be adults, and your grandkids will be growing up in the world. Someday you will be dead, your kids will be old, your grandkids will be adults, and your great grandkids will be growing up in the world, and the cycle repeats and will until the day the human race ends.
So the question becomes, what are you doing to make sure you kids world is one you'd like them to grow up in?
The question came up as I sat with my son on a rocky beach next to a creek. I read Tolkien to him while he gathered rocks and threw them into the water. I couldn't help but think: "This isn't the world I grew up in, but this is a childhood I would have been happy to have."
I don't believe you need to change the entire world to make a world you want your kids to grow up in. It doesn't matter nearly as much as you think what's going on around other continents, or even the national capitol. You can start with your own life, your own home, your own habits.
I was having a discussion about how I'm raising Grayson, and the other person brought up that it must be nice to have money, but then I pointed out that none of the things I'm doing require any particular amounts of money. Walking to the park, walking to the nearby walking paths, a piece of paper and a pen to do lessons, a book you can take out of the library.
"But the parks are all filled with garbage?" -- well cleaning up garbage is free, isn't it? If you do such a thing then quickly the park will no longer be filled with garbage, and the world is a better place. Have you recently done such a thing to make the world a better place?
"But I'm so tired I don't have time or energy to do stuff" -- you have a choice how you spend your time and how you view things, and you can often find energy you didn't think you had for things that are important to you. It might surprise you how much time and energy you find, and you might find it's more of a virtuous cycle than you think. Have you sincerely tried?
"But what if people judge me?" -- you might be surprised, the world may be a lot friendlier than you think.
"It's too hot out or too cold out" -- you might be surprised what you can tolerate when you get into the habit of leaving your climate controlled spaces now and again. Our bodies are surprisingly adaptable to different climates.
"There's nothing good near me" -- you might be surprised, the world may be a lot more interesting than you think when you stop assuming you know all there is to know.
Some people might go "But I don't have a house, I don't have a wife, I don't have kids" and some people might not even have any kind of family or friends. I've been there, I feel you. Right after college, I ended up in a city nowhere near anywhere I'd ever lived before -- no friends, no family, no idea how to build a life. But it's a matter of faith -- you have to keep trying to make your world better, put your home in order, make your community better, and eventually it can pay off. If you do nothing then nothing will happen.
"I can't think of anything!" Think harder. If you're reading one of my posts you're undoubtedly smart enough to think of something. You'll probably have to break patterns of behavior and do things you didn't consider doing.
And for those who don't have kids and think they don't want kids: The future is built by our children. Many people think they don't need to build that future and they'll steal it from someone else, but they're wrong. The future belongs to the children, and the children are raised by their parents. So if we do our duty to the future, then it will be us who guide those children to the future worth living in, and the suicidal ones will simply die out.
Will putting that kind of effort into building the future generations work out? Maybe, maybe not. People say the future is uncertain, but it's never not been uncertain. Mitochondrial Eve is not that far back in human history, and Y-Chromosomal Adam is in a completely different era in time, so not that long ago humanity was reduced to a single common ancestor twice. People say it's immoral to have kids, but that concept is suicidal -- Do you not love yourself? Do you not love your wife or husband? Because your child will be genetically and behaviorally half you and half your partner. Of course you need to take the future as a matter of faith to some degree, but if you don't have faith in that above anything else you'll prove to be a genetic dead-end.
Many people think that our current age of nihilism, hedonism, and decadence is unique. Many people think that this is the first time religion failed. Many people think that this is the first time technology nearly ripped civilization apart. That's an ahistorical view, largely enabled by our postwar focus on the world wars, slavery, and colonialism to the rejection of most of history.
The problems of the bronze age collapse, of the axial age, of the late Roman Republic and later the late Empire, and even crises of post-Roman European society (of which the age of colonization itself was actually a symptom) all have stories to tell about societies that were facing potential collapses, and some of those resulted in collapse (but not the end of the people in most cases), and some led to revolutionary revitalizations. No matter what, the individuals involved needed to continue living even when the societies collapsed. In some cases such as after the collapse of the Roman Empire, the common man actually had huge increases in quality of life -- according to grave records, there was very few times in history where the health of common people improved more than after the collapse of the Roman Empire. So whatever happens we must be preparing for the future -- revolutionary revitalization or collapse.
We live in a world with more mental health issues than any other point in history, and I think the refusal to do the above is one of the reasons. Jean-Paul Sartre suggested that we ought to figure out our personal values, and live by our values, and to live authentically. Spending all day every day in a room looking at a screen isn't living authentically. that isn't to say such a thing can't be part of your life (The Internet gives me great joy in many ways), but human beings are embodied creatures, we live in the real world, we were created in the real world, and we die in the real world. A world where we click on mice and clack on keyboards and stare at screens 16 hours a day and sleep 8 isn't an authentic human life. Embodied human beings must participate in the real world at some point. And I while I'm a capitalist, I don't mean in capitalist spaces either. You don't go out into the world to spend money, you go out into the world to spend time.
I've felt it myself -- how much my happiness and life satisfaction has increased despite the fact that our materialist ideology would predict that I should be unhappy having less spare time, less time playing video games, less time chatting online. Why is visiting a playground or a river and reading a book out loud or picking up trash or doing weekly lessons on paper so fulfilling? I think because it means something, and it's real.
It could never exist any longer because your grandparents are dead of old age, you parents are old, you are an adult, and your kids are now the ones growing up in the world. Like a flowing stream, the water itself has moved on. Someday your parents will be dead, you will be old, your kids will be adults, and your grandkids will be growing up in the world. Someday you will be dead, your kids will be old, your grandkids will be adults, and your great grandkids will be growing up in the world, and the cycle repeats and will until the day the human race ends.
So the question becomes, what are you doing to make sure you kids world is one you'd like them to grow up in?
The question came up as I sat with my son on a rocky beach next to a creek. I read Tolkien to him while he gathered rocks and threw them into the water. I couldn't help but think: "This isn't the world I grew up in, but this is a childhood I would have been happy to have."
I don't believe you need to change the entire world to make a world you want your kids to grow up in. It doesn't matter nearly as much as you think what's going on around other continents, or even the national capitol. You can start with your own life, your own home, your own habits.
I was having a discussion about how I'm raising Grayson, and the other person brought up that it must be nice to have money, but then I pointed out that none of the things I'm doing require any particular amounts of money. Walking to the park, walking to the nearby walking paths, a piece of paper and a pen to do lessons, a book you can take out of the library.
"But the parks are all filled with garbage?" -- well cleaning up garbage is free, isn't it? If you do such a thing then quickly the park will no longer be filled with garbage, and the world is a better place. Have you recently done such a thing to make the world a better place?
"But I'm so tired I don't have time or energy to do stuff" -- you have a choice how you spend your time and how you view things, and you can often find energy you didn't think you had for things that are important to you. It might surprise you how much time and energy you find, and you might find it's more of a virtuous cycle than you think. Have you sincerely tried?
"But what if people judge me?" -- you might be surprised, the world may be a lot friendlier than you think.
"It's too hot out or too cold out" -- you might be surprised what you can tolerate when you get into the habit of leaving your climate controlled spaces now and again. Our bodies are surprisingly adaptable to different climates.
"There's nothing good near me" -- you might be surprised, the world may be a lot more interesting than you think when you stop assuming you know all there is to know.
Some people might go "But I don't have a house, I don't have a wife, I don't have kids" and some people might not even have any kind of family or friends. I've been there, I feel you. Right after college, I ended up in a city nowhere near anywhere I'd ever lived before -- no friends, no family, no idea how to build a life. But it's a matter of faith -- you have to keep trying to make your world better, put your home in order, make your community better, and eventually it can pay off. If you do nothing then nothing will happen.
"I can't think of anything!" Think harder. If you're reading one of my posts you're undoubtedly smart enough to think of something. You'll probably have to break patterns of behavior and do things you didn't consider doing.
And for those who don't have kids and think they don't want kids: The future is built by our children. Many people think they don't need to build that future and they'll steal it from someone else, but they're wrong. The future belongs to the children, and the children are raised by their parents. So if we do our duty to the future, then it will be us who guide those children to the future worth living in, and the suicidal ones will simply die out.
Will putting that kind of effort into building the future generations work out? Maybe, maybe not. People say the future is uncertain, but it's never not been uncertain. Mitochondrial Eve is not that far back in human history, and Y-Chromosomal Adam is in a completely different era in time, so not that long ago humanity was reduced to a single common ancestor twice. People say it's immoral to have kids, but that concept is suicidal -- Do you not love yourself? Do you not love your wife or husband? Because your child will be genetically and behaviorally half you and half your partner. Of course you need to take the future as a matter of faith to some degree, but if you don't have faith in that above anything else you'll prove to be a genetic dead-end.
Many people think that our current age of nihilism, hedonism, and decadence is unique. Many people think that this is the first time religion failed. Many people think that this is the first time technology nearly ripped civilization apart. That's an ahistorical view, largely enabled by our postwar focus on the world wars, slavery, and colonialism to the rejection of most of history.
The problems of the bronze age collapse, of the axial age, of the late Roman Republic and later the late Empire, and even crises of post-Roman European society (of which the age of colonization itself was actually a symptom) all have stories to tell about societies that were facing potential collapses, and some of those resulted in collapse (but not the end of the people in most cases), and some led to revolutionary revitalizations. No matter what, the individuals involved needed to continue living even when the societies collapsed. In some cases such as after the collapse of the Roman Empire, the common man actually had huge increases in quality of life -- according to grave records, there was very few times in history where the health of common people improved more than after the collapse of the Roman Empire. So whatever happens we must be preparing for the future -- revolutionary revitalization or collapse.
We live in a world with more mental health issues than any other point in history, and I think the refusal to do the above is one of the reasons. Jean-Paul Sartre suggested that we ought to figure out our personal values, and live by our values, and to live authentically. Spending all day every day in a room looking at a screen isn't living authentically. that isn't to say such a thing can't be part of your life (The Internet gives me great joy in many ways), but human beings are embodied creatures, we live in the real world, we were created in the real world, and we die in the real world. A world where we click on mice and clack on keyboards and stare at screens 16 hours a day and sleep 8 isn't an authentic human life. Embodied human beings must participate in the real world at some point. And I while I'm a capitalist, I don't mean in capitalist spaces either. You don't go out into the world to spend money, you go out into the world to spend time.
I've felt it myself -- how much my happiness and life satisfaction has increased despite the fact that our materialist ideology would predict that I should be unhappy having less spare time, less time playing video games, less time chatting online. Why is visiting a playground or a river and reading a book out loud or picking up trash or doing weekly lessons on paper so fulfilling? I think because it means something, and it's real.
