I just read somewhere: "Correlation does not imply causation".
Correlation does, in fact, imply causation. It doesn't, however, *prove* causation. If you find a correlation, then you start digging there to find out if there's a causal link.
If correlation did not imply causation, we wouldn't look for correlations since they wouldn't imply that there might be a causal link to look at.
Correlation does, in fact, imply causation. It doesn't, however, *prove* causation. If you find a correlation, then you start digging there to find out if there's a causal link.
If correlation did not imply causation, we wouldn't look for correlations since they wouldn't imply that there might be a causal link to look at.
That's a bit of a nitpick. I always took "imply" in this context to mean logical implication.
- replies
- 1
- announces
- 0
- likes
- 2