> a fucking loser makes up some claims and you present them as true?
If they aren't true, wouldn't a review of the votes prove that?
If they aren't true, wouldn't a review of the votes prove that?
OK, so they didn't follow the existing rules
> Some 60,000 of those votes, he claims, came from voters who did not provide driver's license information or the last four digits of their Social Security numbers
If the rules are there, should they be followedm
> Around 5500 contested votes are absentee ballots from voters overseas registered to vote in four Democrat-leaning counties
Seems like something that we should be careful with if we want to protect our Sacred Democracy?
> Some 60,000 of those votes, he claims, came from voters who did not provide driver's license information or the last four digits of their Social Security numbers
If the rules are there, should they be followedm
> Around 5500 contested votes are absentee ballots from voters overseas registered to vote in four Democrat-leaning counties
Seems like something that we should be careful with if we want to protect our Sacred Democracy?
wom: a person with skibbity Ohio energy
Example: "kamala lost the election because she was such a wom."
Example: "kamala lost the election because she was such a wom."
"Noticer" covers it pretty well.
Hard to not start asking questions if you pay any attention to anything..
Hard to not start asking questions if you pay any attention to anything..
